For years there was only one reliable option to keep info on your computer – working with a hard disk drive (HDD). However, this sort of technology is by now expressing its age – hard disks are really loud and slow; they can be power–ravenous and frequently produce a great deal of heat in the course of intensive operations.
SSD drives, alternatively, are really fast, take in a smaller amount power and they are far less hot. They provide a completely new method of file accessibility and storage and are years in advance of HDDs regarding file read/write speed, I/O efficiency and also power effectivity. Discover how HDDs fare up against the more recent SSD drives.
1. Access Time
After the launch of SSD drives, data access rates are now through the roof. Due to the completely new electronic interfaces employed in SSD drives, the common data access time has shrunk into a all–time low of 0.1millisecond.
HDD drives continue to make use of the same basic data file access technique that’s initially created in the 1950s. Though it has been noticeably advanced after that, it’s slower as compared with what SSDs will provide. HDD drives’ data file access rate varies in between 5 and 8 milliseconds.
2. Random I/O Performance
Due to the exact same revolutionary technique that allows for faster access times, also you can appreciate greater I/O performance with SSD drives. They will perform double the functions throughout a given time in comparison to an HDD drive.
An SSD can deal with at least 6000 IO’s per second.
With an HDD drive, the I/O performance steadily improves the more you apply the hard drive. Nevertheless, in the past it actually reaches a specific restriction, it can’t proceed swifter. And because of the now–old concept, that I/O limitation is a lot less than what you can have having an SSD.
HDD are only able to go so far as 400 IO’s per second.
SSD drives are designed to include as less rotating parts as is practical. They use a comparable technology like the one utilized in flash drives and are more dependable compared with regular HDD drives.
SSDs provide an normal failing rate of 0.5%.
As we have documented, HDD drives depend on rotating hard disks. And anything that employs numerous moving elements for prolonged time frames is vulnerable to failure.
HDD drives’ regular rate of failing varies between 2% and 5%.
4. Energy Conservation
SSDs do not have moving components and require not much chilling energy. They also demand very little power to work – lab tests have shown that they’ll be powered by a regular AA battery.
In general, SSDs use up amongst 2 and 5 watts.
HDD drives are renowned for becoming noisy. They require more electric power for chilling reasons. On a web server which has a large number of HDDs running constantly, you need a lot of fans to keep them cool – this may cause them far less energy–economical than SSD drives.
HDDs use up between 6 and 15 watts.
5. CPU Power
As a result of SSD drives’ better I/O effectiveness, the main server CPU will be able to process file demands faster and preserve time for different functions.
The common I/O wait for SSD drives is exactly 1%.
When you use an HDD, you have to spend time waiting around for the outcome of one’s data query. It means that the CPU will stay idle for additional time, waiting around for the HDD to respond.
The average I/O delay for HDD drives is about 7%.
6.Input/Output Request Times
It’s about time for several real–world illustrations. We produced a full system backup with a web server using only SSDs for file storage purposes. During that process, the common service time for any I/O call remained below 20 ms.
Throughout the identical trials sticking with the same server, now suited out utilizing HDDs, general performance was significantly reduced. During the web server backup procedure, the common service time for I/O requests fluctuated between 400 and 500 ms.
7. Backup Rates
Another real–life improvement will be the speed with which the backup has been produced. With SSDs, a server backup now requires less than 6 hours by making use of ----’s server–designed software solutions.
On the other hand, with a hosting server with HDD drives, a comparable backup could take three or four times as long to complete. A complete backup of an HDD–equipped web server normally takes 20 to 24 hours.
To be able to right away enhance the performance of your respective websites with no need to modify any kind of code, an SSD–driven website hosting service is a good choice. Have a look at the shared hosting packages along with our Linux VPS web hosting packages – these hosting services include really fast SSD drives and are available at the best prices.
- Live Demo
- Each one of our Virtual Private Servers is put together for you at no cost. 99.9% network uptime. Full SSH/full root access.
Compare our prices
- Check out our pricing and select the most suitable Virtual Private Server for your dynamic web sites. You can migrate to a more feature–rich VPS Web Hosting setup with simply a mouse click.
- Compare our hosting plans
- Get in touch with us 24x7x365 by email or by making use of our extra–fast ticketing platform. Our techs are ready to reply to any of your questions within just 1 hour.